Ultimately, it is the context that comes into play, with the sentence usually providing some sort of information that highlights the pluralistic essence of what is technically a singular noun. With “The two were seen walking in a gray car”, it can be indicated that two people were seen; In the same way, “the crew was preparing for the launch” recalls many people who work together, which testifies to a plurality, and it is this idea that pushes a spokesman to prefer a plural abrasing. Sentences (7) and (8) may seem wrong because there are two parents and two boys, but the subject is still considered singular for the purposes of the agreement. However, the plural is used when the focus is on the individual in the group. It is much rarer. Alternatively, you will often see cases where a plural verbage is used with a singular noun that suggests plurality because of its importance and context. These names include couple, trio, quantity, family, crew, crowd, generation and committee. You can see a sentence like “The couple was seen in a gray car on their way out” or “The crew was about to take off”,usually coupling singular subject names (couple and crew) with a plural verblage. In some cases, the chord follows the number of the noun closest to the verb. This is called the approximation rule. This rule applies to topics that contain the following words: Word spell check claims to need a singular verb in (10). The spelling exam is wrong. If more than one of and one plural are followed, the verb is plural.
But there are times when determining what is considered an “agreement” is not so obvious, because what sounds like a singular noun is really plural, or what sounds like a plural noun is essentially singular. This concept is called a fictitious chord, also known as a fictitious concord or synese. More frequently, constructions that “set aside” a singular noun of its plural members (as in the model “a [collective noun] of [members` names]”). On these subjects, spokespeople and authors will often choose to express the verb in the plural: in addition to the fictitious agreement, there is here a second principle that makes the use of a pluralist more “correct” than the singular verb, and this is called the principle of proximity. This means, for example, that in a construction like “many night owls”, one might be more inclined to choose a verb form that corresponds to the plural subnun closer to the verb in the sentence (night owl) than the more distant singular (quantity): key: subject = yellow, bold; verb = green, underlined There and there are never any topics here. The subject follows the verb, and the verb should always match that. For example, if you have a compound or pluralistic subject that functions as a singular entity, it sometimes seems more “natural” for that subject to adopt a singular verb despite formal rules to the contrary. It`s quite simple: is it the singular conjugation of the third person verb that corresponds to the student; are is the plural judgment of the third person to be in agreement with plural students. . . .